Welcome to WindowsClient.net | Sign in | Join

Rob Relyea - XAMLified

WPF, Silverlight and XAML

Syndication

Sponsors





  • advertise here
MVVM, MVP, or code behind–all ok, as long as you build a great Ux

Interesting to see Davy Brion’s critique of MVVM and series explaining MVP in Silverlight/WPF. As a member of the Silverlight/WPF team, I want to ensure that our platforms enable exploring best practices for UI construction. I believe that Data Driven UI is a major benefit of Silverlight/WPF.

Definitely interested to see how these best practices evolve. In the end, I just want you all to build great software for your users! If MVVM helps you, use it. If it gets in your way, find another way.

Ideally, Silverlight/WPF/Blend/VS should be flexible enough to support any of these patterns. When they are not, please be vocal with your feedback.

Published Tuesday, August 03, 2010 7:38 AM by Rob_Relyea

Comments

# Dew Drop – August 4, 2010 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew@ Wednesday, August 04, 2010 8:18 AM

Pingback from  Dew Drop – August 4, 2010 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

# re: MVVM, MVP, or code behind–all ok, as long as you build a great Ux@ Wednesday, August 04, 2010 8:50 AM

It is flexible. I have gotten great success using "View Model Style" (using a View Model with only ICommands, Properties, and Collections, and Behaviors in Blend).

openlightgroup.net/.../Default.aspx

# re: MVVM, MVP, or code behind–all ok, as long as you build a great Ux@ Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:48 AM

Hello,

it's Offtopic, but I don't know how to address you.

Some time ago I found the XamlT-Tool and it was really useful for me. Because my Notebook crashed, I had to reinstall and don't have the Tool anymore.

The Page www.xamlt.com is down, so I can't download it. Could you please tell me how to get XamlT?

Regards

by Dominik

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Page view counter