Rob Relyea - XAMLified - All Comments

re: XAML: Events in compiled and uncompiled scenarios

Ashokkumar — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:04:06 GMT

Hi,

I am using Framework3.5(sp1), VS2008(sp), n Silverlight3.

I tried to do "Option 3a: Use XamlReader.Load() (no compiling) and specify event handlers in XAML (works in v4 and Silverlight)" of your posting. But, i am left with parsing error.

Is it possible in SL3 n Framework3.5?

Please let me know your concern.

Regards

Ashok

re: XAML node loop example: finding all named object instances

Christian Wirth — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:16:03 GMT

Very helpfull code!

Thank you!

Dew Drop – June 23, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

Dew Drop – June 23, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:35:37 GMT

Pingback from Dew Drop – June 23, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

re: WPF Localization

Shamus Dermody — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:14:34 GMT

Hi,

Our developers at Alchemy Software are constantly working to make your localisation process simpler.

At least try Alchemy Catalyst out, send an email to shamusd@alchemysoftware.com and I will send you a free 7 day full licence for Alchemy Catalyst.

Version 8.1 is due to be released at the end of this week, version 8.1 will be incorporating even more wpf, xamal improvements.

re: “Because XAML is so darn fun to say. Zaml.”

austin avrashow — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:02:26 GMT

I agree names are the presentation of conceptual entities. Think of Xi ("zee") which is a purposefully unpronounceable obscuration of the company formerly known as 'Blackwater'.

Dew Drop - June 12, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

Dew Drop - June 12, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:38:41 GMT

Pingback from Dew Drop - June 12, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

re: XAML: Events in compiled and uncompiled scenarios

Jan Kučera — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:25:23 GMT

And what about not compiling, and just navigating to the XAML file?

System.Xaml: Method calls from Xaml

Lester's WPF blog — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:41:35 GMT

Xaml is awesome. I am hearing lot of "yeah"s... So have you tried out the new System.Xaml stack in .NET

re: Why do some WPF projects build differently in VS vs MsBuild?

Rob_Relyea — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:37:05 GMT

Mike -

When this value is true, the MarkupCompiler will isolate all assembly loading into a new AppDomain, which will then get thrown out later.

Problems were likely being caused for people because the same assembly was being loaded twice (perhaps 2 different versions of it), and sometimes we would find the wrong one.

Hope that helps.

Thanks, Rob

Dew Drop - June 4, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

Dew Drop - June 4, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:32:41 GMT

Pingback from Dew Drop - June 4, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

re: FAQ: how to prevent {x:Null} from being written by XAML writer

JC — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:09:43 GMT

Sorry to misuse your comments section, but this post on Stack Overflow "How unique is Xaml?" might really benefit from your input:

stackoverflow.com/.../944964

Great blog btw ;)

Dew Drop - June 3, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

Dew Drop - June 3, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:37:08 GMT

Pingback from Dew Drop - June 3, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

Daily Tech Links - June 3, 2009

Sanjeev Agarwal — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 06:23:03 GMT

Daily Tech Links - June 3, 2009 Web Development Web Browsers Need a Social Layer XAML: Using Generic

re: FAQ: how to prevent {x:Null} from being written by XAML writer

Rob_Relyea — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:57:38 GMT

Denis-

Would love to know why you needed to write down x:Null if that is the default value for a property?

Thanks, Rob

re: FAQ: how to prevent {x:Null} from being written by XAML writer

Denis Vuyka — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:03:01 GMT

Thanks, very interesting. Recently I've spend some time implementing the opposite behavior within a custom XAML serializer. We needed to provide "x:Null" value...